25 Nisan 2013 Perşembe

ESSIE SPEAKS OF NEW PERSPECTIVES

Ok that is a reasonanbly adequate way of describing this week's fare. I should maybe have added that it is rather a dark one.

This week we lay family life, childhood/ school years under the camera and take a good hard look at it. Things are not, as you probably already guessed, quite what they seem. I'm not quite sure why my film watching has taken such a dark turn this week. It contrasts so awfully with the beautiful spring weather we are enjoying over here these days. Then again I suppose, in every light there is a spot of darkness and vice versa. I may or may not have meant to go down this particularly philosophical train of thought. However, here we find ourselves, so reflect on it while you are here. Because this dark side can be found not only in the weather, but in the very hearts of our own families and even in the hearts of innocent school children sometimes. What do I mean? You'd better scroll down to find out :)

happy viewing,
Essie

FAMILIAL LOVE - THOUGH NOT QUITE AS YOU KNOW IT : "WINTER’S BONE"


As we all know probably far too well, families are complicated things. Sometimes all goes well, things are smooth and your family is your sanctuary from the big bad world outside. If things don’t quite go according to plan, you have each other to cling to. Other times, however, things are not so rosy or smooth. And the thing that upsets our lives the most is the family itself – bits of it if not the whole thing.
This is something 17 year old Ree (Jenniffer Lawrence) knows only too well. Her father is part of the local drug trade and therefore often “out of the picture” for one reason or another. Her mother is depressed and withdrawn. All Ree’s younger siblings have to depend on is their older sister who is a mother to all of them – including her own mother – living a very tough life in a poor, mountainous town. Their peaceful yet precarious existence will, however, be shattered by a visit from the local sheriff. In his latest brush with the law, Ree’s father has put their house up as collateral. This means that if he doesn’t turn up for his trial in a week’s time, the family will lose the house. And true to form, Ree’s father is nowhere to be found. So, to save her family, Ree sets out on a route that will bring her face to face with shady characters and members of her own family who tell her to just stay out of it. Staying out of it, however, is definitely not an option. Whether Ree will like the truth she finally uncovers however, is a different matter altogether.
First of all, I love the slightly gritty and tough take this film has on the concept of family. There are many rather beautiful examples of families rallying together in the face of danger, the self-sacrificing, protective “parent” figure and all that. The problem with that is that the films do have a slight “penchant” towards the saccharine. Not this one. Oh no. Ree is very, very real. Her affection for her siblings is more the “tough love” kind and she shows her love and dedication for her family not with frills, but by moving Heaven and Earth, putting herself in genuine danger, just to secure a home for her loved ones. Actions, after all, do speak louder than words. And in that sense, Ree is positively screaming.
The film is technically brilliant too. First of all, as you know Jennifer Lawrence’s Oscar® winning character Tiffany annoyed me. Quite a bit. I love Ree. And it’s a credit to Lawrence that she is equally brilliant at portraying both. I mean, I guess I’m not saying she was bad as Tiffany, I’m just saying I enjoyed this a lot more. Imdb reliably informs me that this is only director Debra Granick’s second feature film. First of all, kudos to the fact that she has literally whipped the floor with her opposition in every festival and awards ceremony she was a part of. It always makes me happy to see strong female directors, as you may have noticed. I really look forward to seeing more of her stuff!

AN EARLY MEETING OF "LIKE MINDS"


What is it with our fascination with psychopaths? I guess it has something to do with the fact that they are the closest thing we have to an alien species. Seeming like any one of us in so many ways, and yet not quite the same. I think it also has something to with the charisma often associated with psychopaths as well. I mean, I have not (to my knowledge) ever met a psychopath but they do seem to put across a bit more of a certain something than your average guy (they generally are guys. Female psychopaths exist but are much rarer). I mean, to the point that I did read an article somewhere that analysed the common traits between psychopaths and successful entrepreneurs, which in itself tells us something or other about the state of the business world today. But I digress. Well, not really.
Like Minds is the story of a psychopath in the making. Alex, the 17 year old son of the headmaster of a very privileged school is being held in custody at the local police station. The charge? The murder of a fellow student, Nigel and possible links to other heinous crimes committed in the area. However, the explanation he provides for the death of his friend is so bizarre that a forensic psychologist has to be brought in. The police chief is sure he’s as guilty as sin but Susan, the psychologist is not that sure. Alex’s tale is one of those yarns that is so tall it just might be too fantastic to be imagined up. He speaks of a world marked with mind games, manipulation and obsession. And as Susan plunges deeper and deeper into this case, one thing becomes painfully clear. Finding the identity of Nigel’s killer is not going to be as easy as it seems. 
Now you might, as I was, be slightly sceptical as to how many more psychopath movies you can take. I mean, yes, we are rather fascinated by this particular kind of killer, especially in harmless movie form. However, this also means that the market is fairly saturated with films about them. And not all of the “saturation” is of the same quality. In this cinematic multitude however, Like minds stands out as certainly a lot more than “just tolerable”.  The performances by the two leads, Eddie Redmayne – who later edged into the limelight with My week with Marilyn among other films and Tom Sturridge are quite superb. And the film gives a rather spine chilling “blow by blow” (if you pardon the pun) account of how a psychopath is born. How, if you will, the step is taken from “tendency” to reality.
I mean yes, it has to be said, there are bits – especially towards the end – that unfortunately slip into the slightly stilted. There were bits where a little originality (though of course I couldn’t say what – but that’s originality for you!) would have been very welcome indeed. Then again though, like I said, Like Minds, for all its original features, is a member of a large extended family, as we have just discussed, so I guess there is bound to be a “family resemblance”. I only wish it wasn’t from the “cliché” branch of the family. But nonetheless, I was easily able to overlook them and have a positively nail-biting time. And that says something, given the quantity of crime drama I watch. Let’s see what you lot make of it. 

18 Nisan 2013 Perşembe

ESSIE TAKES A TRIP DOWN MEMORY LANE

I'm rather pleased with this week's line-up. No I really am and yes, more than usual.

See, I love the way these two particular items come together. Today ladies and gents, I proudly present to you, a very comprehensive slice of life from the '60s. Almost the entire decade is spanned with a little spillage (temporal spillage, as it were) on either side. We do not walk in the super rich or super famous. In fact we walk with the common people. The ones that tend to get forgotten in grand narratives usually. The poor, the underpriviledged, the ones trying to make a living no matter what the stakes. We have two separate yet similar views from two sides of the pond today. One is a series full of heart and warmth that a lot of you here in the U.K. will be familiar with. The other is a cinema classic, one of the first efforts of a director that is today a household name. On the surface, they look stylistically quite different. But really, it's only a change in perspective. And isn't that true of most things in life? So many things are really two sides of the same coin if we look hard enough - but I digress. We're kinda heading into a whole different blog :)

I'd be really interested to know what you think of these two items watched in succession actually. Can anyone give me some feedback on what they think if they do it? It would make me SO happy :)

happy viewing,
Essie

A STEP BACK IN TIME TO AN UNEXPECTED PLACE: "CALL THE MIDWIFE"


I started watching this one out of curiosity more than anything else. I mean yes, we all know what a midwife does. We all know the appeal of medical dramas such as Casualty, Grey’s Anatomy, House M.D. etc. Seriously, could there be something untapped and original in there somewhere? Then again the BBC did seem to be on to something good here. I mean this was an actual true story (and you know what a soft spot I have for those. I call it having a sense of history. I strongly suspect it is more commonly known as being nosey. But I’ll let you be the judge of that move hastily on…  So I decided to check out one episode. Just to see what the fuss was about. I was instantly hooked. Now, in case you were also wondering, I shall attempt to explain to you guys what the fuss is about. J
Call the Midwife is based on the memoirs of Jennifer Worth who worked as a midwife through the 1950’s and 60’s in London’s East End slums. It beautifully records everyday life, the colourful characters and the many incidents all punctuated with the miracle of birth. When the newly qualified Jenny Lee first arrives at Nonatus House she isn’t quite sure what to expect. Especially since she was not aware that she would actually be living in a convent alongside a group of nuns – who also acted as midwives. Jenny Lee is slightly taken aback at her rather novel surroundings – be it the convent or the sheer poverty of post- WWII East London. But in time she comes to think of it as home and family. And along with her so, in a way, do we.
I have always thought that it must be particularly difficult to portray real people. I mean people who really existed. In writing the story, creating the characters for television or film, you have to keep the interest of the audience. But at the same time you can’t really afford to lose anything from the “realness” of the characters and events. It really must be a precarious balance. Especially in cases where the character portrayed is still alive. Even more so in a story like this. I mean think about it, it’s a story of London in the ‘50s. No gadgets, gizmos or special effects. There really has to be a large dose of something to make a successful television series – especially with so many “rivals” around.  I was especially interested to read the reaction of the daughters of Jennifer Worth to the series. Mrs Worth, it would seem, departed this world shortly before the series was broadcast. It turns out that her daughters really felt as if they were “seeing” their mother as a young woman, before they knew her. I think that is saying quite something, don’t you?
Well, Call the Midwife really and truly steps up to the plate. The characters and the stories are so incredibly warm, real and easy to identify with one gets swept up in a matter of minutes. It helps that, despite being set in a completely different era, the story largely revolves around an event that has, in its essence, remained unchanged throughout the ages:  childbirth.  Well, the event itself is unchanged of course, but the circumstances under which it happens have, it has to be said, has changed quite a bit. Yes, there are undoubted plugs for the NHS in the script, and you can think of that what you will. But the problems depicted – that are often, thankfully, no longer an issue – were very real at the time. 

MEANWHILE, ACROSS THE POND... : "MEAN STREETS"


Now we skip a few years. And an ocean – but I digress. What I like about Mean Steets – in conjunction to this weeks’ entries that is, I like a lot of things about the film but more of that in a sec – is that it is actually almost contemporary with Call the Midwife. At a push they are just about 10 years apart. But they both are, basically, a slice of life from impoverished, dangerous areas in two countries literally across the pond from each other. If you think about it, Johnny Boy or Charlie (ok, perhaps not Johnny Boy, but definitely Charlie) could well be one of the husbands of Jenny Lee’s patients. What we have here, you might say, is a simple reversal of perspective. Here however, there is no benign convent and nuns watching over people. Here, it’s a dog eat dog world and it’s really and truly every man for himself…
Charlie (Harvey Keitel) only knows this too well. Of course this is America, you can always build and live your dream, but in Little Italy, it can be a bit harder to do that than your average neighbourhood. Luckily Charlie knows how to use his head. And he has the right connections in the shape of his uncle Giovanni, an influential man in the neighbourhood, a businessman and unofficial moneylender. Giovanni likes Charlie a lot and is even considering making him manager of one of his restaurants, a job that Charlie dreams of and that would secure him for life. However, Charlie is a man torn between his head and his heart. Although his head shows him clearly what path to follow to become a “big man” of the neighbourhood like Giovanni, Charlie’s heart leads him directly to his distant cousin Teresa of whom Giovanni does not approve (on the grounds that she is “sick in the head” i.e. has epilepsy). That could be sidestepped, albeit with difficulty, if they manage to keep the relationship under the radar, which Charlie is doing despite loud protests from Teresa. But then there’s Johnny Boy (Robert De Niro). Charlie’s young, irresponsible and slightly mad cousin is nothing but trouble. Johnny Boy owes money to the entire neighbourhood and has neither a glimmer of hope of paying it back nor an ounce of respect for anyone. He is, as you can imagine, constantly in and out of trouble and heading straight for a very sticky end.  If he wants to achieve his own dreams Charlie may well have to stop bailing him out and concentrate on his own life. But that’s the problem with these head – heart conflicts you see…
This film is, of course, one of Martin Scorsese’s first films. But even so early on we can see the themes the cast and the style that will preoccupy Martin Scorsese for most of his career. This particular film is not for the most part quite as “hard hitting” as his later films. But in a funny kind of way, I like that. Yes, there is a very clear storyline, but the style of the film is a clever mix; that of a fly on the wall documentary mixed with a commercial film. So events unfurl a lot more slowly and less predictably then they would in your “average” Hollywood flic. This also matches Johnny Boy’s character very well, I guess the character in his early twenties (De Niro is 30 at the time but as you know that means very little in the world of film) and in any case Johnny Boy has the level of responsibility of a particularly air-headed 12 year old. He lives with utter disregard for the consequences of his actions and that means things can “erupt” at pretty much any moment. In short, be prepared for surprises.
This is, in fact, the classic story of a main character caught between his heart and his logic. Here the pull of the heart is twofold, because not only does Charlie desperately want to help Johnny Boy out, there is the matter of the woman he loves, Teresa. The dynamic there is also interesting because all Teresa wants is to get out of Little Italy, get a nice little flat and have a quiet life. Charlie however, is determined he will become a man of the neighbourhood. And leaving Little Italy is categorically out of the question. So already we see the strong feel of “neighbourhood” present in a lot of Scorsese films. Here, perversely it almost acts as the ultimate curse that brings Charlie down. To be fair, he would have had a calmer life if he had gone along with Teresa’s plan. Ah, but would their story then be worth making a film about? That, my dears, is a totally different story all together…

11 Nisan 2013 Perşembe

ESSIE SPEAKS OF REPEATING PATTERNS AND DARK HORIZONS

Oh yes. Your author is feeling cryptic this morning. And why not. Besides, I'm not "bending" the facts too much. As you know my watching list tends a little bit to consist of something old, something new, the bathroom sink and something blue. Everything. Which is when I noticed the connection between the twosome we're discussing this week. They were both cult films - or based on cult stories - belonging to completly different generations. As in, one was my generation (I'm a '90s kid me) and the other is for people now officialy half my age (I'm still trying to stomach the fact that I turned 30 yesterday. My family and friends are being very supportive). It's fascinating to see the crossover. As in, some things literally have NOT changed. I mean, we all know that formulas that "work" tend to be repeated but had you noticed  to what extent they were repeated? Read on to find out - it's quite amazing!

I do grumble on about the films a bit. But don't fret. I'm not all negative. I just tell it like it is. They wouldn't be here if I didn't. You know what I mean.

happy viewing peeps!
Essie