I was
warned when I got given this DVD. I was told that it contained stories within
stories, within stories and that soon I would have no idea what the f.ck I was
watching. That stark (ehm) warning and the fact that Bunuel declared it one of
his favorite films meant that I went in for it prepared. I often stopped in my
head and retraced my steps in the plot to make sure I wasn’t completely lost. I
strongly advise you do the same because yes, in places the story does get as
convoluted as you currently imagine it does. I mean come on. Bunuel liked it.
That has to tell you something (if you have seen any of Bunuel’s works that is.
If not, he is one of the surrealist masters of the 20th century).
The story
starts off simply enough. We start with two enemy soldiers fighting in Saragosa
finding an old manuscript. The presence of the manuscript seems to enchant
them, political and military divides are put to one side and they begin to
read. The manuscript seems to be the story of a Walloon Captain during the
Napoleonic wars, Alfonse van Worden (coincidentally one of the ancestors of our
two initial narrators but little is made of this plot turn. Well, the number of
loose threads that DO get tied up, I reckon I can allow them one). He passes
through Saragosa and, crucially, a little place called Venta Quemada on his way
to Madrid on an important mission. His local guides beg and plead with him
against going through Venta Quemada. Ever since two prominent bandits were hung
there, ghosts and demons have been regulars there every night. Alfonse,
however, is a soldier with no time for this nonsense, so he just ploughs on
through. This, he quickly finds, may have been a serious mistake.
We are
plunged into a surrealist adventure populated with mystics, ghosts and demons. We meet fellow travelers on the
way and exchange stories, we exchange stories of stories and dart down little
paths that seem to lead into darkness or nowhere in particular until… Oh yes. The
Saragosa Manuscript is not quite like anything you have witnesses.
Now before
you get further please be warned. This is a 3 hour long film, with a convoluted
surrealist plot, in Polish. As you can see, it truly presents a plethora of
potential problems for the casual viewer. This little film (well, I say little
but actually… ) does, however, present a true treasure trove for those who
brave it. I personally was prepared and pre-warned so, like I pointed out, I was
keeping good track of who was telling who, what. But even so, the film does
offer the occasional moment to recap, where the very confused van Worden simply
has to stop and retrace his own steps. Van Worden (Zbgniew Cybulski) is the
typical everyman. He starts off as a typical young soldier, brave and ambitious
and with an eye for beautiful women. All these, however, turn on their heads
and become his downfall. For, as we all know, the ambition and hotheadedness of
youth are among the things most easily used and abused by the wily. Especially
if the wily happen to be demons and evil spirits. I mean not that I would
personally know this but yeah. Ok. Moving on.
I love the
way the delicate way the storytelling is organized in this film. And I mean,
this is a film made in 1965 with all the technological means of the time; it
fills me with inspiration as to how you could, with more advanced special
effects and such like, make a so much more intricate pattern than that drawn
out in the Saragosa Manuscripts. But then again, we don’t have films like that
anymore. Because, quite honestly, who these days has the time to watch a three
hour film in the first place much less one with intricate multiple stories
within a story that you actually have to make a considerable personal effort to
follow (at one point the story is 5 levels down. As in the manuscript tells the
story told by Alfonse who heard it from a third, who heard it from a fourth who
heard it from a fifth and we change locations to watch the story “live” at
every single change of narrator)? I
mean, I’m not going on about the fact that this structure is rare in the first
place, it naturally is. The problem is that you couldn’t get that kind of
project even the vague hope of a green light these days. Then we have things
like the “short shorts” offered by a popular tv network in the UK. Four – five
minute versions of daytime TV programs for “those with limited time”. Err…
What? I mean, only a decade ago we were lamenting that TV was limiting
attention spans and killing old fashioned story telling. Now TV is suffering
lethal blows from its very own machination. And I mean, can we blame JUST TV?
It’s the way we live today. Smartphones are a big one. We are constantly
“turned on” to the goings on online, constantly in the firing line from our
bosses or the “pushy” social media networks. Even if we have the resolve to
turn off the phones or put them on silent we can’t really concentrate. We know
there are “things” happening whether we are looking or not. And FOMO (fear of
missing out) slowly invades our concentration and our daily life. We no longer
“naturally” have the time to meander through the labyrinths of the Saragosa Manuscript,
we need to get out our GPS and find the quickest way out because we have urgent
emails to reply to, and cat pictures to “like”.
I don’t own
a smartphone. But I am finding I spend more and more time glued to my laptop.
Wifi is becoming a serious “need” – my mother’s house does not have wifi and
sufficet to say that my three week visit here is turning out to be… well
interesting from that perspective. No doubt, when I finally join the smartphone
bandwagon, I will be as glued to it as everyone else. But as someone who has a
genuine old fashioned slice of “life offline” still in their hands, all I can
say is that something is really and truly changing. It is inexorable and like
most change, it is not necessarily bad, it is just the way things are now. But
still… I think we’re going to miss old fashioned storytelling if it actually
vanishes completely. If we actually notice it’s gone, that is.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder