I’m getting
slightly hooked on these westerns. I really am. I totally see why there is a
whole bunch of people out there who watch the old classics ad nauseam. Oh don’t
worry; I won’t be subjecting you guys to the same treatment. But a few of the
good ones will crop up in the blog now and again. The ones that are good,
cinematically relevant you know… I kinda started watching Sergio Leone movies
mainly because Quentin Tarantino is a fan (yes, I’m sad. But you see, Quentin
Tarantino is a guy I am a MASSIVE fan of so I was curious. Plus Sergio Leone
isn’t exactly an obscure character no one has heard of so I wanted to see what
the fuss was about). Anyway. I now know what the fuss is about. I will attempt
to convey said reasons.
We are,
once again in the Wild West. When men were men and only those with sharp wits
but even sharper shooting skills could survive. There are many ways you could
use your wits and gun to live, and one of them is bounty hunting. And the
bounty hunting stakes sky-rocket one fine day, when an infamous bandit and gang
leader, Indio, escapes from prison. Munco (Clint Eastwood) and Colonel Douglas
Mortimer ( Lee Van Cleef) cross paths and swords (well, guns) when they both
start chasing the same man so an uneasy truce is formed between these two lone
wolves. But as the chase continues deep into the heart of the desert and
loyalties are tested over and over again, one thing begins to become painfully
clear: Only one of the bounty hunters is actually after the bounty. The other
one has a slightly different agenda ready for Indio.
I am
actually pleasantly surprised by these films over and over again. We are – or at
least I am – slightly prejudiced into thinking these “old” films are rather
simplistic. They don’t have any special effects – but this we already knew –
and they don’t have any “depth” in the story. You know, black vs white. Goodies
vs Baddies. It HAS to be boring, right? Well, no. Not really.
I mean yes,
it’s true, a lot of these films are “black and white”, but this is still often
an occurrence, especially in mainstream cinema. It is a plain and simple fact
that, for all our snobbery on the matter, we enjoy it. We want to cheer the
good guys and boo the bad guys, get all worked up, but deep down know that the
goodies WILL prevail in the end. When worded like that, that just sounds like
an incredibly boring idea. But this
film appeals straight for our heart strings so cleverly, you just… Get sucked
up. Besides, it is not a simple matter of good overcoming bad”. Firstly, this
is the Wild West. Everyone is CONSTANTLY double crossing everyone else. You
have to be constantly on your toes to follow the shifting alliances and you can
never quite guess which way the plot is going to swerve next… Plus, there is
the matter of the definition of “good” and “bad”. In this instance, Indio is as
bad as bad can be. But the “good”… Well… I mean, to my mind, Clint Eastwood is
automatically “good” but is he, here, in this instance? He is, basically,
killing people for money. Ok I grant you, they are “bad” people but still. He
is dangerously close to being a hired killer. And then there is the fact that
he is very clearly quite selfish – in that he is out to protect number one –
and ONLY number one. I mean, this being Clint Eastwood, his charisma carries
him but still. Oh and by the way, you have NO idea how impressive Clint
Eastwood is in a western role until you have seen it. No wonder he never quite
drops the act (I mean I’m sorry but it IS true). As for Lee Van Cleef – the archetypal
western villain – he seriously gives Mr Eastwood a run for his money as far as
charisma goes. And that is really, REALLY saying something.
In short, if you need a whirlwind of cathartic
emotion to whisk you away from your day to day troubles, Sergio Leone is your
man, again. Highly recommended.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder